Democrat Doublethink
As I look about the Liberal blogs and Liberal Media writings, I notice that, among them, the notion of Bush lying is an undeniable truth. *Sigh* oh here we go again!
Bush has not lied. For those of us who can remember all the way back that far, it was almost four years ago to the day today that President Bush adressed a joint session of Congress and laid out the plans for the War on Terror he told us plainly that this would be a long campaign, carried out in many countries, over a long period of time.
Bush said any regime that harbored terrorists would be considered a hostile regime. Iraq harbored many terrorists. Even if we accept Liberal rants that there was no 'al-Qaeda presence, and I don't, there was an undeniable Islamic Jihad presence there. These are the sweet fellows who are blowing up Israeli pizza parlors these daysand are responsible for the deaths of many Americans.
Now, what psychosis, you ask, enables someone, supposedly a rational person, to say that there was no 'al-Qaeda presence, and an undeniable Islamic jihad presence is ok, means nothing? It is called doublethink.
Doublethink is an old tradition on the Left. In the 1930s, Fascism was the enemy of Communism and was ever denounced in their propaganda. But in 1939 the USSR made a non-agression pact with Nazi Germany. Suddenly Fascists were brother (national) socialists with Imperialists as a common enemy. Most on the Left didn't even question this, they went right along with it and looked at Fascists as groovy. One Leftist of that time, a young Eric Blair, didn't buy this. He would later write "1984" under the penname George Orwell. Orwell's central character, Winston Smith, witnessed the totalitarian Left Wing state he lived in, Oceania, declare war on Eastasia and take Eurasia as an ally. Previously Eurasia had been the enemy and Eastasia the ally. Oceania pretended that Eastasia had ALWAYS been the enemy and expected its citizens to believe it. The believing of this is doublethink.
After 9-11 the president said he would go after terrorist states. He has merely done what he said he would do four years and three days ago. A majority of Democrats were on board. They protested how they so loved this nation and were with the war on terror as well as any conservative.
But then the doublethink kicked in. All of a sudden taking out the Headquarters of one of the biggest terrorist organizations in the world doesn't count. It distracts from the "real war on terror." This is also doublethink in opposition to the fact that terrorists are coming to Iraq to fight America and are getting killed in droves. This is DISTRACTING from the War On Terror? OHHHH-K!
We need to not let the Democrats get away with this blatant hypocrisy, we need to stand up and remind them of inconvenient moments in their pasts and point out their duplicity. We need to stop letting our good soldiers and cops die for their political correctness and hypocrisy! Let us ever remind them.
Bush has not lied. For those of us who can remember all the way back that far, it was almost four years ago to the day today that President Bush adressed a joint session of Congress and laid out the plans for the War on Terror he told us plainly that this would be a long campaign, carried out in many countries, over a long period of time.
Bush said any regime that harbored terrorists would be considered a hostile regime. Iraq harbored many terrorists. Even if we accept Liberal rants that there was no 'al-Qaeda presence, and I don't, there was an undeniable Islamic Jihad presence there. These are the sweet fellows who are blowing up Israeli pizza parlors these daysand are responsible for the deaths of many Americans.
Now, what psychosis, you ask, enables someone, supposedly a rational person, to say that there was no 'al-Qaeda presence, and an undeniable Islamic jihad presence is ok, means nothing? It is called doublethink.
Doublethink is an old tradition on the Left. In the 1930s, Fascism was the enemy of Communism and was ever denounced in their propaganda. But in 1939 the USSR made a non-agression pact with Nazi Germany. Suddenly Fascists were brother (national) socialists with Imperialists as a common enemy. Most on the Left didn't even question this, they went right along with it and looked at Fascists as groovy. One Leftist of that time, a young Eric Blair, didn't buy this. He would later write "1984" under the penname George Orwell. Orwell's central character, Winston Smith, witnessed the totalitarian Left Wing state he lived in, Oceania, declare war on Eastasia and take Eurasia as an ally. Previously Eurasia had been the enemy and Eastasia the ally. Oceania pretended that Eastasia had ALWAYS been the enemy and expected its citizens to believe it. The believing of this is doublethink.
After 9-11 the president said he would go after terrorist states. He has merely done what he said he would do four years and three days ago. A majority of Democrats were on board. They protested how they so loved this nation and were with the war on terror as well as any conservative.
But then the doublethink kicked in. All of a sudden taking out the Headquarters of one of the biggest terrorist organizations in the world doesn't count. It distracts from the "real war on terror." This is also doublethink in opposition to the fact that terrorists are coming to Iraq to fight America and are getting killed in droves. This is DISTRACTING from the War On Terror? OHHHH-K!
We need to not let the Democrats get away with this blatant hypocrisy, we need to stand up and remind them of inconvenient moments in their pasts and point out their duplicity. We need to stop letting our good soldiers and cops die for their political correctness and hypocrisy! Let us ever remind them.
2 Comments:
Why dont you just be honest and say you hate liberals... I am sure they hate you.
And comrade, there is no such thing as an honest politician, democrat or conservative or any other flavour. So sadly, Bush is as much a liar as any other. But his lies have far greater consequence, being President of the US... and lies and power are a dangerous combination; ask the ordinary residents of Chile, Cuba, El Savador, Iraq, Afghanistan that.
Phil, UN, Afghanistan.
How come the CIA, with a budget in the many billions and a total staff approaching 20,000, never caught Bin Laden? After four years! Just incompetence?
Post a Comment
<< Home